Exploring the co-benefit of electric vehicle uptake and ozone pollution reduction in Sydney - Final report

CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology advise that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology (including each of its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Fig. 3. The spatial distribution of the yearly average exceedence frequency of the 1–h ozone NEPM AAQS of 100 ppb. Left-internal combustion engine passenger vehicles; centre-electric vehicles with batteries charged from renewable sources; right-batteries charged using coal-fired power stations.. Fig. 4. The spatial distribution of the yearly average exceedence frequency of the 4–h ozone NEPM AAQS of 80 ppb. Left-internal combustion engine passenger vehicles; centre-electric vehicles with batteries charged from renewable sources; right-batteries charged using coal-fired power stations. .